Special Focus
The generation gap finds its way to work
Around The Region
Forestland conservation easement intersects sustainable community, economic development
On The Move
UW Sustainable Management program exceeds expectations
News Makers
Kim Parmeter
Construction
1-35 rebuild, school construction boost spending

Thursday
September 2, 2010

Business News
CNNfn
CBSMarketwatch
Bloomberg
Reuters
BusinessWeek
PRNewswire

Political News
Salon
Slate
The Atlantic
The Nation
Mother Jones

Sports
ESPN
Local Sports

 
 
 
Send A Letter To The Editor
 
Letters To The Editor



Charlotte Neigh, Co-chair Citizens Against the Mesaba Project (CAMP)
 
12/24/2006 1:18:04 PM

To the Editor:
I'm glad that you covered the public hearing regarding Excelsior Energy's attempt to force Xcel Energy to purchase the output of Mesaba I - the coal-gasification, 600 MW power plant proposed to be built in Itasca County. However, some corrections and additions are required.
There were at least 200 people present for the 5:00 p.m. session at Taconite; contrary to what was stated in the report, there were even more people present for the 1:00 p.m. session, reflecting the high level of concern among local residents.
The article referred to mncoalgasplant.com as a "Web site". It is that, but its role in this proceeding is as an intervening party, submitting evidence and argument to be considered by the judges and the PUC.
No one is arguing that the Itasca County site is "pristine", however its trees and more than 300 acres of wetlands are closer to being pristine than to being the brownfield site abandoned by LTV near Hoyt Lakes that was cited by Excelsior in 2003 when it received special privileges from the legislature.
The 2006 bonding bill provided $11 million (not $55 million as reported) for Itasca County infrastructure to be used for either Mesaba Energy or Minnesota Steel or both. $55 million is the amount that Mesaba was seeking from the legislature for its infrastructure needs.
If Tom Micheletti actually said that his project won't die if the PUC doesn't approve the power purchase agreement with Xcel, that is big news and deserves to be explored. Until now Excelsior's stated position has been that if this PPA is not approved, not one shovelful of earth will be turned. If the PUC rejects the proposed PPA as either too expensive or not in the public interest, what other entity would be interested in purchasing the power from Excelsior?
Charlotte Neigh, Co-Chair
CAMP (Citizens Against the Mesaba Project)

Previous Letters To The Editor:
 
Cheqtel web site
 
TwinPortsPaper
 
Lake Superior College
 
Contract Tile and Floor
 
Site Map
Home Page
About Us
Advertising
Archives
Around the Region
BN Columnists
BN Lists
Business Law
Business Mentor
Calendar
Coaches Corner
Construction
Daily Briefing
Editorials
Exclusives
Investing
Letters to the Editor
News From KUWS
News From KDAL
Marketing
Newsmakers
Nonprofit Hotline
On the Move
Press Releases
Search
Send Us News
Special Focus
Stock Charts
Buy Online!
Technology
Tell Us What You Think
 

 

BusinessNorth
2024 W. Superior St.
Suite 201
Duluth, MN 55806
Phone: 218-720-3060
Fax: 218-720-3068
news@businessnorth.com


Privacy Policy ©2001 DCS Netlink www.dcsnetlink.com

Minnesota and Wisconsin’s source for the latest news on forest products, construction, real estate, conference centers, tourism, and Minnesota mining. Serving Duluth, Grand Rapids, and Ely MN. As well as, Ashland, Spooner, Bayfield and Hurlley, Superior WI.
Duluth newspaper, Minnesota, Wisconsin, newspaper online, Duluth mn news, Minnesota mining, Ashland WI, Hurley WI Spooner WI, Grand Rapids MN, Ely MN, Bayfield MN, Superior WI, forest products, mining, Minnesota business, Minnesota real estate, Wisconsin Business, business news, Duluth Business