|Monday, December 9, 2013||Search Our Site|
News From 91.3 KUWS
Legal sea change: 50th anniversary of Gideon decision
Half a century ago, a convicted Florida man wrote a handwritten letter to the United States Supreme Court. Mike Simonson begins our series on the 50th anniversary of “Gideon v. Wainwright”.
He argued that he was denied justice because he couldn’t afford a lawyer and should have been given one at his trial. That letter lead to the right to counsel for low-income people accused of crimes.
Fresh out of law school and on his first day in private practice, Superior attorney Toby Marcovich was appointed to take a case of a man who couldn’t afford a lawyer. Marcovich demanded a preliminary hearing. The judge didn’t like that and threatened to cite him for contempt of court. This was 1954, nine years before the Gideon decision.
“We got paid nothing to do this but my client, shortly after deer season opened, brought me a big bag of venison. But anyhow, that was my first experience of being appointed counsel. And it was almost my last.”
The judge didn’t hold Marcovich in contempt. But while judges in Wisconsin generally did appoint a lawyer for people who couldn’t afford one, Douglas County Public Defender J. Patrick O’Neill says it was often long after a person had been charged and interrogated, and not long before the trial began. "If he felt the person deserved representation, he'd say 'Bailiff! Go find a lawyer.' Bailiff would go out, wander the halls of the courthouse, maybe go down to the local coffee shop, whatever. When he found a guy he recognized as a lawyer, 'The judge wants you right now', drag him into court, judge would say 'Mr. Lawyer, here's your new client. There you go."
O’Neill says more than half of the people accused of crimes in Douglas County qualify for a court-appointed attorney. Before Gideon, it was hit or miss if a judge would appoint representation in most states. Walter Dickey has taught at the UW School of Law since 1976. He says defense attorneys just weren’t common place. "It's not just that there was no right. There was no culture in which criminal defendants were uniformly having an expectation of representation.”
The Constitution Project’s Criminal Justice Policy Counsel Liz Fasse (foss-see) says the lack of legal expertise aside, a courtroom is a pretty intimidating place for a person without an attorney. "It meant that they were facing the great resources of the state against them."
That means police, investigators, prosecuting attorneys, and a judge. Before Gideon, Fasse says many people were found guilty of crimes they didn’t commit..
"Unfortunately, we don't know how much injustice was done. According to the National Registry of Exonerations we now are at over 1200 individuals who have been exonerated for crimes they did not commit. Unfortunately, that's probably just the tip of the iceberg."
On June 3, 1961, Clarence Gideon was convicted of stealing wine and change from a vending machine in a Florida pool hall. He asked for but was denied an attorney. Sentenced to five years in prison, the man with an eighth grade education wrote a letter to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking for a new trial. In an archival interview, Gideon said he didn’t need a law degree to write that letter. "I thought actually that was a law. I thought that was a Constitutional right and didn't know no different. And a man with money can hire a lawyer to represent him. He'd get a better chance in a trial than I would get without an attorney. To me, that was just common sense. There was no argument to it."
On March 18, 1963, the Court ruled unanimously that Clarence Gideon’s Constitutional rights were violated and that everyone has the right to counsel. Gideon was found innocent in his second trial.
Still practicing law in Superior, Toby Marcovich says Gideon changed everything. "I mean, we were getting probably too many assigned cases as private attorneys before the public defenders system came into effect. But after Gideon, it was overwhelming."
State legislatures funded public defender programs and people who couldn’t afford an attorney got one. "It was a good thing. Even as a prosecutor I felt that it was important for defendants to have their rights preserved. There was some bad stuff going on on occasions. People actually being deprived of rights, given bad information, sometimes maybe deliberately."
On March 18, 1963, that changed.
Previous KUWS Articles:
BusinessNorth - The business news source for Northeastern Minnesota and Northwestern Wisconsin.|
P.O. Box 16223, Duluth, MN 55816
Phone: 218-720-3060 Fax: 218-720-3068 email@example.com